What's in a name, Wright?

Left 'n Wright*

*to too read
[Or Rong and Left?]
So it is no longer 2.

Food for Thought...

Or Fodder for Field Blossoms ?

F1*, f2,   

* links unembedded further "fodder for" ? !

5-20-13: Krugman perspectivism.
I'm not saying...
Is it a win for transparency or more of the same GOP trickle-down?
James Rosen Treason?
Robert Kennedy Jr. Plumbers?

FB
Recently Pulled Submission(Not by me)  Re: Watergate/ Democrats ~ holding to their own standards ~ their own~ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-f-kennedy-jr/obama-nixon-watergate_b_3305611.html

C: Green walled [!]

5-22-13*** 
IRS testimony**, the other Rand, McCain/Graham Rice, "fool's errand" [?]
**Issa touts the 5th (C-NOW w/ Alex Wagner) "Republicrats" "Democans" "barking up the wrong tree" Charlie Cook.
(*** b.s.): Knot So Well ?  Sheep in FOX clothing? 

5-23-13: Boardman, Reich, Wired, Cole ? Not to coat tails.
Millennial Miss fits?

Proxymoron?

Romney/Ryan* - "Social Darwinism"

BS (Blog Search)

Make no mistake, I am not associating President Obama with Proxymoron for using "Social Darwinism" wrong. I am not using Social Darwinism as it is commonly** used, since it evolves.

Even The Righteous Mind will evolve us.***

* Huffington Post (NFR)

** "common sense is not so common"

Related proxy-aphorism? Counter-Rush or Tea Party or FOX Think.

i.e. For every force there is an equal and opposite reaction. NOT! The word is action.

Maybe false dichotomy applies.

*** If corporations have become persons, what is society?

Further sources of comment on this event.

Christian Science Monitor

The Guardian

CBS News

The White House (the event: AP Luncheon)

[I Ron Knee of the Bottom Line? That I have yet to listen to the full speech.]

(Footnote: last link entered simul-speech about 14:40 on. Mitt Maligns Marvelous!)

[Loopholes? The Mitt Medvedev Moment. By George. Apologies for the tongue in cheek or cubism on the side but please Ctrl F "Loopholes"under the bold MMM.]

[Other Message Mean 'm, or Forum or 40m mark in video? Check that, 38 minutes, first question, not to mention BS remark. Grand Slam ? Or B in GO!]

[Speaking of GPS: "What we have here" is a Galley Project SimpBowlized, by the deficit commission and the Kitchen/Boat math, marvelous mangling and tale gating. (Also see 2 comments.)]

[P.S. under a Google of "AP Luncheon" I found this interesting Hoist by his own Picard by John Hull. A careful reading and reference to sources would indicate a hoist of his own profession not to mention his metaphorical name. My father had a boat made by Swiftsure. Three flushes you're out! The three strikes are A. the fact-check error. B. the Lockner v. New York error C. the Wickard v. Filburn error. In context: Obama is a "professor", Lockner v. New York was probably what Obama was referring to or in era in general, which John Hull flushes, and Wickard v. Filburn recognized the power of the federal government to regulate economic activity. I mean, the gizzard of that guy.]

8-16-12
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

LIB...YA!

to the shores of Tripoli.
Gadhafi pulled from drain pipe...
Libya can now MoveOn.

[10-21-11 segue-tangent i.e preface post]

I have never been in the military but I have boxed at Sand Point. Not to continue a biopun, but...my point is that politics is the point and needs a point and takes time. What doesn't?

Note original address*(Obama Doctrine) not to mention follow up**.

* scroll over
** pause for research
Note: labels to evolve***, Obama Doctrine/Obamanomics/G'ribble mix.
*** up date: "the universality of freedom" not exactly.

[biopun? Obama March '09 Oh Nien? Oh Eight! OW.]
[Navigation Tips: sometimes scroll over, sometimes click, sometimes Ctrl F, note upper left search box often embedded, if not fully employed.]

Said Relief?

Who said, he Said, they said.

Egypt Update.
Speaking of Journalism** or freedom's intent.
Other Associations and Said Groups...

Note preemptive nature of links, as not all are read fully nor sometimes more than scrolled over.

In that vein, here is another mid-read comment--
--
The Prophet Margin* or "Decartes Bones"(not 2 mention) quote:(p.XIX)

Most people seem to be caught between these tidal currents--the pull to faith and tradition in a dangerous world, the argument that religion is at the core of the world's problems and only a revived commitment to individual freedoms and rights will steer humanity into a better future.

Colin Slee said about England:"You have a triangle with fundamentalist secularists in one corner, fundamentalist faith people in another, and then the intelligent, thinking liberals of Anglicanism, Roman Catholicism, baptism and methodism, other faiths--and, indeed, thinking atheists--in the other corner."

--

* my characterization although I do not necessarily appreciate the characterizations that follow, but it is the Ge Oh Me Try, not to mention who is at the table.

** link lost in editing(still looking) maybe found.
[along the same line, the first link is too embedded in comment on journalism and comment, while the last link on "freedoms"(edit to possessive)is embedded with preemptive history and irony
(ex. Alexander Hamilton against the Bill of Rights, yet for a National Bank.)]
[Journalism link now replaced and here is an un-embedded link from it.]

Speaking of Relief:or spin zones or characterizations. 'nO'Really!

[Said Review: Post an achronism. (Relative to perspectivism)]

Hold your head up Paul Krugman!

Reform Is Needed. Reform Is in the Air. We Can't Afford to Fail.Truthout.org by: Joseph Stiglitz | Visit article original @ The Guardian UK

Geithner's Plan Will Tax Main Street to Make Wall Street Richer by Dean Baker Truthout.org or Huffington Post

Paul Krugman rounds out or triangles out the table. I will only make one comment in that the bottom line is the people, and since the trickle down has caused an economic bubble if not civilization to go up in smoke and mirrors, that the burden is there on that bottom line, while the money is in the clouds. OK, now I'm rolling. But seriously, I am not sure if we are caught between salting the clouds and salting a mine, but Humpty Dumpty * needs help. Are these the Three Musketeers?
[*] Pre-Post-or-us? links embedded: A Plea to Congress ! Between the charges ? "Off a Cliff" And do we have d'Artagnan on The Fence?

Irony versus Hypocrisy

Smackdown: Shuster Nails Ari Fleischer over GOP Hypocrisy
Shuster gives as good as he takes, but the irony is that Fleischer is there arguing over the childishness of Obama when Rush is not elected by the people, and neither is he. So the Catch 44 is that if Obama is wrong for painting the Republicans with a Rush Brush, then MSNBC is wrong for presenting unelected spokespeople for the Republicans, however it is the nature of the media to try to present both sides, and the nature of the Republicans to use Joe the Plumbers.
Speaking of plumbers and whose job it is...
Several links having filtered through my email box unprofessionally*
bridge the spectrum and filling the bill.

I will not unembed the threads but leap to the next field so to speak.

A more selective approach browsing the TED forum, a spin on the technology of politics and religion by Noah Feldman presents a preemptive perspective on hope. Having viewed less than two minutes, I noted before logging out, the following:(Unmodified but for one dash)
The third leg if not noted here is Economics and the Point is Justice or the fulcrum the Law. Values and their management is the key. Balancing the tetrahedron of flip-flop so to speak. The hour glass of consumption or conservation. Economics Politics Religion Law for the People - Executive, Legislative, Judiciary for the people and the point of balance.

I had my own preemptive concerns which need to be upgraded [3-6-09]and revisited, but how does this connect to the above?(a pun on hierarchy?) Facing choices and nemeses, not to mention the connection to things being in their place, whether fields or technologies and who uses what or whom and for what. Further search may dig up a reference to direct cause ofor[***] systems.

But prepost I read: Staving Off a Great Depression by Dean Baker The Guardian UK and where does this fit? In the fear or faith options; or fight or flight, excuse or blame sections. But I propose that the numbers game be given international scope[Update **].
[UPDATE 3-20-09: The following section remains in its original form but for bold. See BINGO which follows to where it relates to the nature of preemption.]
The honesty of the new budget and accounting now includes the war on terror which was not on the books. So rather than the declare a win or lose the economy bifurcation, the new accounting must include the soft power ingredients that do not come free. I have not seen where this is said, but it should and probably has been or will be.
[BINGO! or rather none other than Warren Buffet gets it.]

*i.e. by friendly nemesies however undivinely.

** Update International Scope and a new link at revisited: "Panarin insisted he didn't wish for a U.S. collapse, but he predicted Russia and China would emerge from the economic turmoil stronger and said the two nations should work together, even to create a new currency to replace the U.S. dollar." This guy may be the Rush of Russia but he could be on the same page as Putin, while I feel that economics may be the bailiwick of the Rumpole. "She who must be obeyed" and changed.

*** ofor: metaphysical synergistic concatenation

Label (IV)

LABELS

The Mis-Underestimator

In-Chief.
"the universality of freedom"[update link]

[Update: 1-13-09 ...as whiney flip-flopper alone: "He is so not the caricature we have been fed for
so long."
Speaking of rhetoric, no dis but... could just anyone right this stuff? or unembed? d' oh, but no duh!?]
[A tribute to press conferences: Are Bushisms really Bushisms?]
[Bottom Line: Bush is hard to misunderestimate, let alone understand, yet they definitely did, misunderestimate him, and that is no lie. In fact probably a self-fulfilled prophecy, as he continually shot for lowering the bar, otherwise known as preemptive victimhood.]
[I should note that one thing that should not and cannot be overestimated is my ability to footnote or tangent as my links are inserted at the slightest whim or reference, and not always read more than slightly...by me let alone others.]
[I need to time stamp my updates to demonstrate preemption, but I just opened my Progress Report email "The Ultimate Exit Interview".]
[in finding a link found The Guardian of Freedom on the Wane- Off Course .

Imaginings...(GAZA)

Here we go again. Of course reading the full story may make a difference, but I will pre-empt that.

What happened to "the principle of one president at a time"?

There is no talk of Obama approving direct diplomatic negotiations with Hamas early on, but he is being urged by advisers to initiate low-level or clandestine approaches, and there is growing recognition in Washington that the policy of ostracising Hamas is counter-productive.

The President-elect is rarely mum.

[At this point I pause to read the full story and post a leak(tangent). The contradictions may be of the nature of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" stay mum, which is impossible. Combined with the hope for a free society and progress. Epitomized by the irony of the discussion about secret talks.]

OH, THE IRONY!!!

Is it just me
or is it just ice.

It certainly seems ironic that terrorists are confessing while politicians are pleading their case on the tortured field of justice. Irony may be in the eye of the beholder, yet the competition for finding the logic in both cases is staggering, and maybe stronger in the case of martyrdom. Maybe after mentioning the irony, I have ironed this out, for was not Nixon a martyr of sorts? To what I don't know. But justice is the irony, in that both cases short circuit it. One from the top, the other from the bottom, the irony may be cut by the idea that they are getting their orders top down, while justice it seems is bottoms up and down the drain.
[Speaking of hot air and bubbles: OK it was hydrogen.]

ACTION ITEM !!! [
There is enough irony in the pardon situation, the confession situation may be more clear, as making martyrs will continue the war on terror. The irony is not in the terrorists, it is in the war, where justice would at least take away one recruitment tool. Not to mention if you are not with us, you are against us. If terrorists are for the death penalty, where are we? It is not irony that terrorist don't want justice, because in this case the process has been violated, which gets in the way of their martyrdom. By forgoing any change in the process, they risk progress being made, and one more recruitment tool lost. That may be the exception that proves the irony, in that the administration used exceptional logic.

Meanwhile: It might be wise to keep or promote Patrick Fitzgerald. Speaking of Nixon, there is irony in the Nixon to China concept. And hope in the Obama from Chicago process. And justice may be around the corner, but economics is the bigger picture.